Dissent and Democracy:
the disappearance of Political Icons

    By Teodros Kiros (ph.D) | November 4, 2008

A long line of brilliant thinkers have linked the idea of dissent with the possession
of a consistent intelligence- an intelligence that knows how to create power and
also maintain it.

    The relentless Machiavelli who was divided
    between his respect of democracies and his
    love of republics advised sovereigns who
    wish to create power and maintain it to be
    sufficiently flexible, when new political
    situations demand it, and also listen
    carefully to fortune, when it meanders its
    way. Virtu propels the engines of the
    uniquely political; and Fortuna favors
    leaders only when they intuit its presence
    and shutoff the analytical propensities of
    intelligent rulers.
Politics, argued Machiavelli, cannot be anchored on moral goodness-that is too
utopian, but rather on virtu (flexible disposition) and Fortuna (luck). Both concepts
are crucial for the understanding of the distinctly political. Virtu produces
appropriate political action swiftly, intelligently and courageously; Fortuna projects
ample opportunities that favor the moves of Virtu. Both Virtu and Fortuna work in
concert to move the people from passivity towards social movements that aim at
changing their lives and increase their freedoms by creating power and counter
the tyrannies of an oppressive regime.

The current leader of the Ethiopian regime known for his erudition has certainly
read Machiavelli’s Prince and is actively using its teachings, for the particular
purpose of squashing dissent by annihilating the voices of dissent, exactly as
Machiavelli advises.

It is not an accident that, Tewodros Afro, the Icon of contemporary Ethiopian
Music is rotting in prison. The Ethiopian sovereign has taken Machiavelli’s advise
to heart and is aiming at jailing, killing and intimidating the Icons of the Ethiopian
people.

Machiavelli’s advise centers on what the sovereign has to do to remain in power,
once power is acquired. Maintaining power is much more difficult than coming to
power. One could come to power if Fortuna favors the leader. Once thus favored
the sovereign then must master the techniques of virtu to stay in power, otherwise
the leader looses ground, as Machiavelli counsels.

The prime minister of Ethiopia has been doing exactly that. He is maintaining the
project of tyranny by imprisoning political icons systematically. His tyranny is not
madness but a mastery of virtu. All his moves are following Machiavelli’s advice to
the last page and so far it is working for him- as he continues to stay in power.    

My next article will turn Machiavelli against him, as I would begin advising the
Ethiopian opposition to use Machiavelli as an advocate of the Ethiopian people’s
movement.
Back To Democratic Path Or Home
Democratic Path