Rights Report on Ethiopia Sparks Fierce Debate
3 November, 2010 | Peter Heinlein (VOA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A U.S.-based human rights group has raised an uproar with a report
arguing that development assistance to Ethiopia may be doing more
harm than good by strengthening a repressive government. The report
has sparked condemnation in some quarters, praise in others.
scathing counterattack online. Statements posted on the foreign
ministry website accuse Human Rights Watch of "unbridled arrogance"
and "warped neo-colonialism."
One statement calls the allegations a "make believe" story that is part of
a "vendetta" against the Ethiopian people. Another accuses the rights
group of trying to bully the international aid community into halting
cooperation with Addis Ababa.
A consortium of 25 aid donors, known as the Development Assistance
Group, issued a statement saying it disagrees with the conclusions in the
HRW report. The DAG, as the assistance group is known, said its own
independent study earlier this year uncovered no evidence of widespread
or systematic aid distortion.
The full DAG study posted on the group's website, though, paints a
different picture. It states that its study was a "desk-top" exercise - not
an investigation - and no specific allegations were checked.
The study notes that a fact-finding mission late last year by the U.S.
Agency for International Development observed the potential for
political bias in the allocation of aid. It recommended further analysis to
determine if systematic distortion takes place on the basis of political
affiliation.
The United States is Ethiopia's largest individual aid donor, giving an
estimated $1.3 billion per year. USAID Country Director Thomas Staal
said the types of distortion alleged in the HRW report would be difficult
for a donor study to detect.
"To us, the important thing is to make sure the programs are well
managed, closely monitored with strict accountability systems, and
you're building institutions that can make sure programs are meeting the
goals, targets and beneficiaries intended," said Staal. "And you cannot
go after individual cases of an allegation here and there."
Authors of the Human Rights Watch report call the Development
Assistance Group's response to their allegations "disingenuous." In a
telephone interview, HRW Horn of Africa Senior Researcher Leslie
Lefkow said the aid community has been timid in confronting Ethiopia's
government with charges of misusing aid money.
"This is one of the ironies of research we did, and the discussions we
had with officials before we published this report, is that many of them
privately acknowledge the characterization of the regime as repressive.
They acknowledge these characteristics privately, but publicly there is
no appetite for voicing this analysis."
Ethiopian opposition leader Bulcha Demeksa is a former World Bank
director and a long-time senior official of the United Nations
Development agency. He said the ruling party's access to vast sums of
cash during the last election should have been a red flag to donors that
aid money was involved.
"I do not understand how they cannot see the huge amount of money
that was spent in elections this year," said Demeksa. "Where does this
money come from? Ethiopia, all by itself, cannot sustain that. I believe
this money was from the various types of aid coming from donors."
Demeksa said political payments were so widespread during the election
that anyone not receiving money was socially ostracized. "In my own
district I know very well ... and there is no house this has not touched.
People are now afraid if they think somebody has not received money,
and is not a thorough EPRDF supporter, nobody goes to his house, he
is not invited to weddings, social functions."
Lefkow said the ruling party's influence has grown exponentially in
recent years. "Between 2005 and 2010, the party increased its
membership to between 4 million and 5 million, that is one in seven
adults, which means in most families you have a party member, and in
most kebeles (village districts) every household probably has a party
member. So I do not think it is an exaggeration to say the party has
essentially infiltrated every layer of Ethiopian society."
Prime Minister Meles Zenawi rejects characterizations of Ethiopia as a
"one party state." He describes it as a dominant party state.
In parliamentary elections this year, the EPRDF and its allies won 99.6
percent of the seats. In village and regional council elections two years
ago, the party won all but three of nearly 3 million seats.
Ethiopia remains one of the world's poorest countries, though official
figures show the economy has grown 10 percent or more in each of the
past seven years.
Courtesy
3 November, 2010 | Peter Heinlein (VOA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A U.S.-based human rights group has raised an uproar with a report
arguing that development assistance to Ethiopia may be doing more
harm than good by strengthening a repressive government. The report
has sparked condemnation in some quarters, praise in others.
- The Human Rights Watch report
issued last month accuses Ethiopia's
government of using development
aid to suppress political dissent. The
105-page document alleges that
much of the $3 billion a year
contributed by foreign donors is
used to consolidate the
power of the ruling Ethiopian
Peoples' Revolutionary Democratic
Front.
Ethiopian government spokesmen
did not answer repeated phone calls
scathing counterattack online. Statements posted on the foreign
ministry website accuse Human Rights Watch of "unbridled arrogance"
and "warped neo-colonialism."
One statement calls the allegations a "make believe" story that is part of
a "vendetta" against the Ethiopian people. Another accuses the rights
group of trying to bully the international aid community into halting
cooperation with Addis Ababa.
A consortium of 25 aid donors, known as the Development Assistance
Group, issued a statement saying it disagrees with the conclusions in the
HRW report. The DAG, as the assistance group is known, said its own
independent study earlier this year uncovered no evidence of widespread
or systematic aid distortion.
The full DAG study posted on the group's website, though, paints a
different picture. It states that its study was a "desk-top" exercise - not
an investigation - and no specific allegations were checked.
The study notes that a fact-finding mission late last year by the U.S.
Agency for International Development observed the potential for
political bias in the allocation of aid. It recommended further analysis to
determine if systematic distortion takes place on the basis of political
affiliation.
The United States is Ethiopia's largest individual aid donor, giving an
estimated $1.3 billion per year. USAID Country Director Thomas Staal
said the types of distortion alleged in the HRW report would be difficult
for a donor study to detect.
"To us, the important thing is to make sure the programs are well
managed, closely monitored with strict accountability systems, and
you're building institutions that can make sure programs are meeting the
goals, targets and beneficiaries intended," said Staal. "And you cannot
go after individual cases of an allegation here and there."
Authors of the Human Rights Watch report call the Development
Assistance Group's response to their allegations "disingenuous." In a
telephone interview, HRW Horn of Africa Senior Researcher Leslie
Lefkow said the aid community has been timid in confronting Ethiopia's
government with charges of misusing aid money.
"This is one of the ironies of research we did, and the discussions we
had with officials before we published this report, is that many of them
privately acknowledge the characterization of the regime as repressive.
They acknowledge these characteristics privately, but publicly there is
no appetite for voicing this analysis."
Ethiopian opposition leader Bulcha Demeksa is a former World Bank
director and a long-time senior official of the United Nations
Development agency. He said the ruling party's access to vast sums of
cash during the last election should have been a red flag to donors that
aid money was involved.
"I do not understand how they cannot see the huge amount of money
that was spent in elections this year," said Demeksa. "Where does this
money come from? Ethiopia, all by itself, cannot sustain that. I believe
this money was from the various types of aid coming from donors."
Demeksa said political payments were so widespread during the election
that anyone not receiving money was socially ostracized. "In my own
district I know very well ... and there is no house this has not touched.
People are now afraid if they think somebody has not received money,
and is not a thorough EPRDF supporter, nobody goes to his house, he
is not invited to weddings, social functions."
Lefkow said the ruling party's influence has grown exponentially in
recent years. "Between 2005 and 2010, the party increased its
membership to between 4 million and 5 million, that is one in seven
adults, which means in most families you have a party member, and in
most kebeles (village districts) every household probably has a party
member. So I do not think it is an exaggeration to say the party has
essentially infiltrated every layer of Ethiopian society."
Prime Minister Meles Zenawi rejects characterizations of Ethiopia as a
"one party state." He describes it as a dominant party state.
In parliamentary elections this year, the EPRDF and its allies won 99.6
percent of the seats. In village and regional council elections two years
ago, the party won all but three of nearly 3 million seats.
Ethiopia remains one of the world's poorest countries, though official
figures show the economy has grown 10 percent or more in each of the
past seven years.
Courtesy
| All rights reserved. |
| Ethio Quest News Together We Can Make It! |
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| Previous Stories New Ethiopia law may criminalise opposition - group By Barry Malone... Ethiopia's opposition parties resist new draft law on terrorism Sudan Tribune Is Rock Throwing Punishable by Death in Ethiopia? SMNE A row over human rights Feb.5 ( Economist ) - INDEPENDENT voices in Ethiopia are finding it ever harder to be heard. Suffocated by an irascible government,... More |
| "Government's human rights record remains poor" Human Rights Watch |
| Human Rights |
| Related Stories Ethiopia's largest Opposition condemns DAG response to human rights watch Jimma Times Dev't Group Slams Allegations of Aid Abuse Addis Fortune Ethiopia Dismisses Human Rights Watch Report James Butty (VOA) Ethiopia: Donor Aid Supports Repression Human Rights Watch In Ethiopia, aid for the ruling party Globe and Mail Release of Human Rights Watch's new report on Ethiopia, Development without Freedom: How Aid Underwrites Repression in Ethiopia Star Africa Canadian and western allies see aid co-opted in 'repressive' Ethiopia: report Winnipeg Free Press Ethiopia: Human Rights Watch World Report 2010 Human Rights Watch Ethiopia: Amend Draft Law Human Rights Watch |
