Sudan - What a break-up would mean to the Sudanese and Africa

Egypt’s takeover of
Sudan’s Gezira scheme
----
The Fate of the Nile Basin
Initiative after
May 14th.2010
----
Nile Basin: Obstacles and
future challenges
----
Struggle over The River
Nile; what should be
Sudan's strategy?

What a break-up would mean to the Sudanese
and Africa

09 January, 2011 | By Murithi Mutiga (Daily Nation)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benjamin Madut was barely into his teens when the second Sudan
civil war broke out.

He remembers everyone in his family fleeing in different directions as
the Sudanese air force bombarded his village near the North-South
border.

When the bombing subsided, villagers gathered in groups and
trekked for days until they reached Ethiopia. Families were divided
as those old enough to fight returned to join the war on the Southern
side and others died from their wounds or from hunger as they made
the long journey to refugee camps.

Mr Madut was one of the lucky ones. He survived and came to
Kenya before being moved to the United States as one of the tens
of thousands of “Lost Boys of Sudan” who were the subject of a
2003 documentary film of the same title.

On Sunday he will be one of the 3.9 million registered Southern
Sudanese voters who will cast their votes in polling centres in eight
countries across four continents in a pivotal referendum on self-
determination.

“People are very excited to witness this dawn,” he said. “We are
anxious to vote. Personally, I feel grateful and privileged that this
happened in my lifetime, and, God willing, I will tell my
grandchildren that I was one of those that took part in this process.”

Across Southern Sudan that feeling will be shared by thousands of
people who will vote in a referendum whose results some analysts
say will give way to the most important political transformation on
the continent since the end of apartheid two decades ago.

There is little doubt that Southerners will vote to secede as officials
of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) focus their
efforts on achieving a decisive win.

The break-up

That vote to separate will have major consequences. It will lead to
the break-up of Africa’s biggest state and the world’s tenth-largest
country. It will also fundamentally alter the economic and
geographical landscape of the East African Community, in which
Southern Sudan has already applied for observer status.

But a return to war – especially if the North and South fail to thrash
out key post-referendum issues – could also be vastly costly, with
one aid agency estimating the cost to the region at $100 billion.

That is an outcome regional players such as Kenya, Ethiopia,
Uganda, Egypt and others like the US and China will be anxious to
prevent.

Kenya’s Foreign Affairs permanent secretary Patrick Wamoto told
the Sunday Nation he was optimistic the transition would be
peaceful.

“The registration process has gone remarkably well, and it is
encouraging that the pronouncements of leaders from both sides
have been largely positive. This is a vast country with major
infrastructure challenges, but from all indications I would say there is
every sign that the vote will meet the threshold of a fair referendum,”
the PS said.

Border demarcation

Mr Wamoto said Kenya would engage the two parties to resolve
crucial post-referendum issues such as border demarcation,
citizenship rights and the fate of the Abyei region.

The decision on Abyei will be especially contentious because it is
claimed by both sides and is rich in oil and populated by both the
South-leaning Dinka and the Misseriya Arabs.

On Friday Sudan President Omar al- Bashir said if the South took
over the Abyei region it would risk a return to war. But the South
points to multiple international arbitration decisions that have given it
the right to the region.

In the past 10 days there have been several efforts to engage the
key players in a bid to find peaceful means of resolving their disputes
in the critical six-month window that closes on July 9 when the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) expires.

Last week Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka was in Egypt where
the leadership has been strongly opposed to Southern secession,
mainly due to their fears that the South would reject their proposed
Nile treaty. Mr Musyoka told President Hosni Mubarak that Kenya
would work with the South and Egypt to resolve any differences and
that there was nothing to fear from an independent South.

Last Monday, Lands minister James Orengo delivered a message of
good will to Salva Kiir from Prime Minister Raila Odinga assuring
him that Kenya would stand by the South and support it in the post-
referendum phase. It was a similar message to that delivered by
acting Foreign Affairs minister George Saitoti, who is leading a
government delegation to Juba to observe the referendum.

The high-level Kenyan engagement is a reflection of what is at stake
in South Sudan. Kenyan firms are the dominant players in the
telecommunication, banking and insurance, construction, airline,
food and beverage and retail sectors in most of Southern Sudan.

Independence for the South will unleash its vast untapped potential.
Apart from having some of the largest oil reserves in Africa outside
Nigeria and Angola, Southern Sudan has the capacity to feed most
of the region.

The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) says 90 per cent of
the land in Southern Sudan is arable, representing 12 per cent of
sub-Saharan Africa’s total arable land. Currently, only 16 per cent
of this land is under cultivation.

All this potential could remain untapped if there is a breakdown in
negotiations that will follow the vote.

Due to the length of the voting period – which will run over seven
days – there have been concerns about the possibility that the
process could be disrupted by militias that have been fighting the
Southern leadership over the last five years.

On Saturday it was reported that fighting instigated by a militia had
left six dead in Unity State.

Mr Wamoto said “a few skirmishes” could not be ruled out but
expressed confidence that the vote would largely pass smoothly. He
said security had been stepped up in overseas voting centres,
including in Kenya which, at 15,000, has registered the highest
number of overseas voters.

Possibility of violence

Many in Southern Sudan, though, are not worried about the
possibility of violence before or after the vote. They are also not
concerned about the doubts that have been expressed about the
capacity of the country’s leadership to handle the challenge of nation
building.

“When you have been through 50 years of fighting and instability as
we have been, there is nothing that would worry you too much. We
are confident about the future. And whatever it holds, we know we
will tackle those challenges as an independent and sovereign nation,”
Mr Madut said.

MURITHI MUTIGA mmutiga@ke.nationmedia.com

Courtesy